The Financial Strategy (F3)

Verified Answer: = B

CIMA F3 compares different forms of long-term finance, including preference shares and bonds/Eurobonds, focusing on control, tax treatment, gearing impact, and flexibility.

Statement B captures a key advantage of preference shares from the company’s perspective: if profits are poor, preference dividends can be omitted or deferred, especially when they are cumulative. Although unpaid dividends accumulate, non-payment does not normally constitute default in the same way as missing an interest payment on a bond. For a Eurobond, failure to pay interest when due would place the company in default, triggering legal and reputational consequences. This extra flexibility is exactly why preference shares might be favoured over bonds.

Statement A is misleading: Eurobonds are often unsecured, and security (or lack of it) is not a defining difference versus preference shares.

Statement C is incorrect in this context: redeemable cumulative preference shares are typically treated as a financial liability under IFRS (like debt), so they would generally increase gearing, not reduce it.

Statement D is clearly wrong as dividends are not tax-deductible, whereas bond interest normally is. Therefore, the best justification for issuing preference shares rather than a Eurobond is B.

Current year:

Revenue = $50m

PBIT = $10m → margin = 10/50 = 20%

Tax = 20%

Earnings = 10 × (1 − 0.20) = $8m

Next year:

Revenue still $50m

40% of revenue = $20m → margin falls to 18%

PBIT on this part=20×18%=3.6\text{PBIT on this part} = 20 \times 18\% = 3.6PBIT on this part=20×18%=3.6

60% of revenue = $30m → margin stays 20%

PBIT on this part=30×20%=6.0\text{PBIT on this part} = 30 \times 20\% = 6.0PBIT on this part=30×20%=6.0

Total PBIT next year:

3.6+6.0=9.6 million3.6 + 6.0 = 9.6\ \text{million}3.6+6.0=9.6 million

Earnings after tax next year:

9.6×(1−0.20)=9.6×0.8=7.68 million9.6 \times (1 - 0.20) = 9.6 \times 0.8 = 7.68\ \text{million}9.6×(1−0.20)=9.6×0.8=7.68 million

Percentage reduction in earnings:

8.00−7.688.00=0.328=0.04=4%\frac{8.00 - 7.68}{8.00} = \frac{0.32}{8} = 0.04 = 4\%8.008.00−7.68​=80.32​=0.04=4%

Correct option:

C. Reduction of 4.0%\boxed{\text{C. Reduction of 4.0\%}}C. Reduction of 4.0%​

Company HGG is young, unlisted, loss-making so far, and has uncertain growth.

Weaknesses of using the dividend growth model here:

A. Future growth rate in earnings/dividends is hard to estimate – very true for an early-stage, high-uncertainty business.

C. It has been unprofitable and has no established dividend pattern, so the basic inputs to the model (D₀ and g) are unreliable.

E. Cost of capital is difficult to estimate for an unlisted company (no directly observable beta or market data).

B is just a description of the model, not a specific weakness here, and D is incorrect because the dividend growth model does discount future dividends (it fully incorporates time value of money).

✅ Answer Q121: A, C, E

Most appropriate is asset-based valuation because RRR is unlisted, has just made a loss and pays dividends only occasionally. Earnings- and dividend-based models (P/E, earnings yield, DVM) rely on stable, positive earnings or dividends, which RRR does not currently have, so valuing the tangible and identifiable intangible assets is more reliable.

Pre-acquisition

Company A

Earnings = $50m

P/E = 12 → Market value = 50 × 12 = $600m

Shares = 100m → Share price = 600 / 100 = $6.00

Company B

Earnings = $16m

Combined current earnings = 50 + 16 = $66m.

Post-acquisition assumptions

Earnings increase by $4m → New total earnings

= 66 + 4 = $70m

Combined P/E = 12

→ Total market value = 70 × 12 = $840m

Effect of the 1-for-1 share exchange

Company B has 40m shares, so Company A issues 40m new shares.

New total shares in Company A = 100m + 40m = 140m

Post-acquisition share price:

New price=Total valueTotal shares=840m140m=$6.00\text{New price} = \frac{\text{Total value}}{\text{Total shares}} = \frac{840m}{140m} = \$6.00New price=Total sharesTotal value​=140m840m​=$6.00

This is the same as the original $6.00, so the percentage increase in Company A’s share price is:

6.00−6.006.00=0%\frac{6.00 - 6.00}{6.00} = 0\%6.006.00−6.00​=0%

So the expected increase in share price is 0%.

A. “A bond issuer must appoint at least one market-maker…” – TRUE (in exam context)

On public bond markets, an issuer typically works with one or more banks/dealers as market-makers. Their role is to quote buy and sell prices and help ensure liquidity so investors can trade in and out. From an exam perspective, this is treated as a standard feature of traded corporate/government bonds.

B. “The redemption yield… can be determined by calculating the internal rate of return…” – TRUE

The redemption yield (yield to maturity) is exactly the IRR of the bond’s cash flows (all coupon payments plus redemption amount) based on the current market price. That’s standard CIMA F3 territory.

C. “Investors in traded bonds have an ownership stake…” – FALSE

Bondholders are creditors, not owners. They have a contractual right to interest and principal, but no equity participation, voting rights, or residual claim (except in liquidation after other priorities).

D. “A first-time bond issuer will find it easier to issue bonds than arrange a conventional term loan.” – FALSE

It’s usually the opposite. For a new issuer, arranging a bank term loan is typically quicker and simpler than accessing the bond market, which involves credit ratings, documentation, listing and investor marketing.

E. “Governments are the most frequent issuers of bonds…” – TRUE

Governments regularly issue sovereign bonds (treasuries, gilts, etc.) both to finance spending and to roll over existing national debt. This is exactly how public deficits are funded in practice and is a standard statement in financial strategy texts.

Hence: A, B and E.

PBIT = $1.1m

Debt = $2m at 5% → interest = $0.1m

Profit before tax = 1.1 – 0.1 = $1.0m

Tax at 20% = 0.2m → Earnings after tax = $0.8m

Earnings yield = Earnings ÷ Market value of equity = 10%:

0.8=0.10×MV⇒MV=0.80.10=$8m0.8 = 0.10 \times \text{MV} \Rightarrow \text{MV} = \frac{0.8}{0.10} = \$8\text{m}0.8=0.10×MV⇒MV=0.100.8​=$8m

Shares in issue = 4m → share price:

Price=84=$2.00\text{Price} = \frac{8}{4} = \$2.00Price=48​=$2.00

Answer: C: $2.00

 C – More cash = able to react quickly to unexpected investment opportunities.

 D – Cash buffer reduces the likelihood of liquidity problems in a downturn.

 E – If excess cash were returned, markets might read it as “no good growth opportunities”, so retaining avoids that negative signal.

Disadvantages of net asset basis:

B – Net book value is historic cost based and reflects accounting conventions, not current value.

D – Net realisable value is usually different from NBV, so NBV may misstate value.

E – Many intangible assets (brands, goodwill, know-how) are missing from the balance sheet, so value is understated.

Answer (Q116): B, D, E