The Splunk SOAR Certified Automation Developer Exam (SPLK-2003)

For a container in Splunk SOAR to utilize context-aware actions designed for notable events from Splunk, it is crucial to ensure that the notable event ' s unique identifier ( event_id ) is included in the search results pulled into SOAR. Moreover, by adding a Common Event Format (CEF) definition for the event_id field within Phantom, and setting its data type to something that denotes it as a Splunk notable event ID, SOAR can recognize and appropriately handle these identifiers. This setup facilitates the correct mapping and processing of notable event data within SOAR, enabling the execution of context-aware actions that are specifically tailored to the characteristics of Splunk notable events.

 A step when configuring event forwarding from Splunk to Phantom is to create a Splunk alert that uses the event_forward.py script to send events to Phantom. This script will convert the Splunk events to CEF format and send them to Phantom as containers. The other options are not valid steps for event forwarding. See  Forwarding events from Splunk to Phantom  for more details.

Configuring event forwarding from Splunk to Phantom typically involves creating a Splunk alert that leverages a script (like event_forward.py) to automatically send triggered event data to Phantom. This setup enables Splunk to act as a detection mechanism that, upon identifying notable events based on predefined criteria, forwards these events to Phantom for further orchestration, automation, and response actions. This integration streamlines the process of incident management by connecting Splunk ' s powerful data analysis capabilities with Phantom ' s orchestration and automation framework.

In Splunk SOAR, a child playbook can access both the container data and the action result data from the parent playbook. This capability allows child playbooks to continue processing data or actions that were initiated by the parent playbook, ensuring smooth data flow and facilitating complex workflows across multiple playbooks. When a parent playbook calls a child playbook, the container (which holds the event and artifact data) and action results (which hold the outputs of previously executed actions) are passed to the child playbook.

This access enables more flexible and powerful automation by allowing the child playbook to build upon the work done by the parent.

References:

Splunk SOAR Playbook Documentation.

Splunk SOAR Playbook Development Best Practices.

The ROI (Return on Investment) Settings within Splunk SOAR are designed to help organizations assess the value derived from their use of the platform, particularly in terms of resource allocation and efficiency gains. The setting mentioned in the question, " Number of full time employees (FTEs), " relates directly to measuring this efficiency.

Answer " C " is correct because configuring the number of full-time employees (FTEs) in the ROI settings allows an organization to input and monitor how many personnel are dedicated to security operations managed through SOAR. This setting is crucial for calculating the labor cost associated with incident response and routine security tasks. By understanding the number of FTEs involved, organizations can better assess the labor cost savings provided by automation and orchestration in SOAR. This data helps in quantifying the operational efficiency and the overall impact of SOAR on resource optimization.

In contrast, other options like " Analyst hours per month, " " Time lost, " and " Annual analyst salary " might seem relevant but are not directly configurable within the ROI settings of Splunk SOAR. These aspects could be indirectly calculated or estimated based on the number of FTEs and other operational metrics but are not directly input as settings in the system.

This use of FTEs in ROI calculations is often discussed in materials related to cybersecurity efficiency metrics and SOAR platform utilization. Official Splunk documentation and best practices guides typically provide insights into how to set up and interpret ROI settings, highlighting the importance of accurate configuration for meaningful analytics.

Under Asset Ingestion Settings in Splunk SOAR, when configuring an asset, the number of labels that must be applied can be zero or more. Labels are optional and are used to categorize data and control access. They are not a requirement under Asset Ingestion Settings, but they can be used to enhance organization and filtering if chosen.

Decision blocks are most useful when selecting one (or zero) possible paths in the playbook. Decision blocks allow the user to define one or more conditions based on action results, artifacts, or custom expressions, and execute the corresponding path if the condition is met. If none of the conditions are met, the playbook execution ends. Decision blocks are not used for processing different data in parallel, evaluating complex, multi-value results or artifacts, or modifying downstream data in one or more paths in the playbook.  Decision blocks within Splunk Phantom playbooks are used to control the flow of execution based on certain criteria. They are most useful when you need to select one or potentially no paths for the playbook to follow, based on the evaluation of specified conditions. This is akin to an if-else or switch-case logic in programming where depending on the conditions met, a particular path is chosen for further actions. Decision blocks evaluate the data and direct the playbook to different paths accordingly, making them a fundamental component for creating dynamic and responsive automation workflows.

Splunk Phantom supports incremental backups in addition to full backups. An incremental backup is a type of backup that only copies the data that has changed since the last backup (whether that was a full backup or another incremental backup). This method is more storage-efficient than a full backup because it does not repeatedly back up the same data, reducing the amount of storage required and speeding up the backup process. Differential backups, which record the changes since the last full backup, and partial backups, which allow the selection of specific data to back up, are not standard backup types offered by Splunk Phantom according to its documentation.

The Investigation view in Splunk SOAR provides a comprehensive and holistic view of an incident. This view includes vital details such as event metadata, Service Level Agreement (SLA) status, severity, sensitivity of the event, and other relevant information. It allows analysts to track and manage incidents effectively by presenting a clear picture of all aspects of the investigation process. This view is designed to help users take timely actions based on critical data points, making it a pivotal feature for incident response teams.

Other views like Executive or Analyst may focus on specific reporting or technical details, but the Investigation view provides the most complete perspective on the incident and its progress.

References:

Splunk SOAR Documentation: Investigation View Overview.

Splunk SOAR Incident Response Best Practices.

When building a playbook in Splunk SOAR, if the desired artifact value does not appear in the auto-populated list of input parameters for an action, users have the option to manually enter the Common Event Format (CEF) datapath for that value. This allows for greater flexibility and customization in playbook design, ensuring that specific data points can be targeted even if they ' re not immediately visible in the interface. This manual entry of CEF datapaths allows users to directly reference the necessary data within artifacts, bypassing limitations of the auto-populated list. Options B, C, and D suggest alternative methods that are not typically used for this purpose, making option A the correct and most direct approach to entering an unlisted artifact value in a playbook action.

When assigning an input parameter to an action while building a playbook, a user can use the auto-populated list of artifact values that match the expected data type for the parameter. The auto-populated list is based on the contains parameter of the action inputs and outputs, which enables contextual actions in the SOAR user interface. However, the auto-populated list may not include all the possible artifact values that can be used as parameters, especially if the artifact values are nested or have uncommon data types. In that case, the user can type the CEF datapath in manually, using the syntax artifact. < field > . < key > , where field is the name of the artifact field, such as cef, and key is the name of the subfield within the artifact field, such as sourceAddress. Typing the CEF datapath in manually allows the user to enter the unlisted artifact value as an input parameter to the action. Therefore, option A is the correct answer, as it states how it is possible to enter the unlisted artifact value. Option B is incorrect, because deleting and recreating the artifact is not a way to enter the unlisted artifact value, but rather a way to lose the existing artifact data. Option C is incorrect, because editing the artifact to enable the List as Parameter option for the CEF value is not a way to enter the unlisted artifact value, but rather a way to make the artifact value appear in the auto-populated list. Option D is incorrect, because editing the container to allow CEF parameters is not a way to enter the unlisted artifact value, but rather a way to modify the container properties, which are not related to the action parameters.